Page 35 - Htain Manual
P. 35

Nations  that  have  overcome  some  of  these  barriers  and  made  better  progress  in

               establishing HTA. One of the most conducive factors  or contexts where these barriers are

               overcome  is  where  the  major  part  of  total  health  expenditure  is  through  public  health

               expenditure, and private out of pocket expenditure is limited. In nationals like China, Taiwan,
               Indonesia, and South Korea, the adoption of HTA has been faciliated by political  will and

               enabling legislation. Good handholding by national agencies like in Thailand, China, Indonesia

               have also made a major positive difference. Even for similar public health interventions the
               report and recommendations arising out of HTA studies may vary due across nations due to

               differences  of  geography,  epidemiology,  political  environment,  organization  of  health

               systems, income and various local intangible factors. The main focus of international technical

               support should be the introduction of evidence-based decision making process into health

               systems.

                        Many lessons can be learned by both nations of the developed and developing world

               by sharing their experiences in the journey of HTA across different regions and how it has

               been put to use to improve performance of healthcare systems. India has the need as well as

               opportunity to adopt HTA in decision making which becomes evident from international HTA
               experience especially from countries like Thailand and Cuba which are at similar levels of

               economic development.




               References:

                   1.  Anderson JA. By the numbers: Technology assessment helps hospitals make decisions
                       that make cents. Medical Imaging 2000;
                   2.  Goodman CS: Introduction to Health Care Technology Assessment. HTA101. The Lewin
                       Group.  January  1998.  National  Information  Center  on  Health  Services  Research  &
                       Health  Care  Technology  (NICHSR).  National  Library  of  Medicine.  1998,
                       www.nlm.nih.gov/archive/20040831/nichsr/ta101/ta101_cl.html.notice.html
                   3.  Agence d'Evaluation des Technologies et des Modes d'Intervention en Sante (AETMIS),
                       International  Society  of  Technology  Assessment  in  Health  Care  (ISTAHC).  Health

                       Technology Assessment: Decision-Making for Health, 2001
                   4.  Eldar R. Health technology assessment and quality of care. Croatian Medical Journal
                       2002;43:510-512
                   5.  Saokaew S, Sugimoto T, Kamae I, Pratoomsoot C, Chaiyakunapruk N (2015) Healthcare
                       Databases in Thailand and Japan: Potential Sources for Health Technology Assessment
                       Research. PLoS ONE 10(11): e0141993. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0141993


                                                           23
   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40