Page 52 - 1.HTAIn_Process_Manual

b In case of markov model,

comment on the biological

plausibility of the model.

(Rate on a scale of 1 to 10)
2.2.1.2 Were the assumptions Comment on whether all underlying

underlying the model assumptions were clearly mentioned in the

described clearly? (Rate on report/manuscript.

a scale of 1 to 10)

2.2.2 Costs

2.2.2.1 Are all the costs included Check whether all costs considered were in

in line with the study concurrence with the perspective of the study.

perspective? (Yes=1,

No=2)

2.2.2.2 Have all the associated
costs been captured

comprehensively? (Rate on

a scale of 1 to 10)

2.2.2.3 If primary data has been If primary data was collected, whether top

collected pertaining to down, bottom up or normative costing approach
costs, comment on the was considered.

appropriateness of the

methodology. (Rate on a

scale of 1 to 10)

2.2.2.4 If secondary sources have

been used, are they
justified? (Rate on a scale

of 1 to 10)

2.2.2.5 Are the conversion rates

used for costs appropriate?

(Yes=1, No=2, NR=3)

51 | P a g e