Page 18 - 1.HTAIn_Process_Manual

S. No. Indicators Definition Parameter Scoring Data source
Accuracy and whether 4 = accuracy 60%– National dialysis
(specificity and the screened 80% and screened program)
sensitivity) of the disease could disease could be  Literature review
proposed be cured cured  Consultation/Opi
intervention to 3 = accuracy 80% but nions of relevant
screen or screened disease stakeholders in
diagnose the could not be Indian context
disease of the cured
patients and the 2 = accuracy 60%–
expected 80% and screened
outcome beyond disease could not
the screening or be cured or
diagnostic accuracy 60% and
screened disease
could be cured
1 = accuracy 60%
and screened
disease could be
cured
 National Vertical
3. For Prevention: program data (e.g.
Risk reduction or Effectiveness 5 = > 90% National dialysis
preventive of the 4 = 81% – 90% program)
capacity intervention to 3 = 71% – 80%
provided by the prevent the 2 = 61% – 70%  Literature review
proposed disease 1 = ≤ 60%  Consultation/Opi
intervention to nions of relevant
the population stakeholders in
Indian context
5 = Very great
Impact on impact toward
household HH expenditure
expenditure as a Level of 4 = Great impact
consequence of economic toward HH  Literature review
Economic providing health impact on expenditure  Expert
impact on intervention to a household 3 = Moderate
4 consultation
household family member expenditure of impacts toward
expenditure with disease/health HH expenditure  household
consideration of problems’ 2 = Minor impact surveys, NHSSO
catastrophic treatment cost toward HH
illness or health 1= No impact
catastrophe toward HH
expenditure

17 | P a g e